Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andra Keay's avatar

The majority of people producing copyright material are independent artists. They will be the ones disproportionately affected by AI theft. As mentioned by Gary Marcus and in the comments below; with the well known players it's rinse and repeat - overreach, get sued, settle and do it again.

Expand full comment
Eric Cort Platt's avatar

I noticed this in the Bard email today: “Using a technology called SynthID, all unique images generated on Bard will have embedded watermarking to indicate that it was created by AI. The watermark is directly added into the pixels of an AI-generated image, meaning it’s imperceptible to the human eye but it can still be detectable with SynthID. It’s important that we approach the creation of images with AI responsibly.”

So users ares stamped with a watermark on the output, but the input is taken scott-free (so far). Interesting.

"Being able to identify AI-generated content is critical to promoting trust in information. While not a silver bullet for addressing the problem of misinformation, SynthID is an early and promising technical solution to this pressing AI safety issue."

https://deepmind.google/technologies/synthid/

Hey Google – If you're so smart, how about developing a system for identifying where your inputs and outputs came from (even when relatively morphed) – some kind of end-to-end IP chain of custody technology (CoC) sorta thing? IPCoC ?... Now *that* would be cool... more cool than more Mario look-alikes ...

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts