"I've changed my mind. Trump did not simulate fellatio. It was a non-fellatio joke about a mic stand that was too low. I know you agree with me."
"I already told I thought Trumps pantomiming fellation was a joke following a rant about being provided a mic stand that was too low."
Try to agree with yourself, first.
"I've seen other presidents make jokes, so it's not a first."
You've never seen a presidential candidate simulate fellatio at a rally. No presidential candidate has ever been *remotely* that crude. (Feel free to disagree, but if you disagree, provide evidence. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.")
When one changes one's mind, one no longer agrees with the first position. That's how changing one's mind works. I know you agree with this. Or at least you will if you think about it.
We both know Trump did not crudely simulate fellatio and have both said so because we both watched the video. We both know that the video is the evidence that we both made our decision on.
You might want to try to agree with yourself. Part of you is really onto something.
I changed my mind--that Trump did actually simulate fellatio--after looking at the video more carefully. When I first watched the full video, I simply watched the entire approximately four minutes, without focusing on what he did at 3:00 into the video.
You "changed" your mind, because your acknowledgement that he did simulate fellatio became inconvenient for you.
You've changed your mind twice. Now that you have you changed it again you should go to you other comments where you were last in the "no Trump fellatio" camp and let them know. Be consistent.
I haven't changed my mind twice. I initially wrote, after looking at the full video, that it was clear Trump didn't simulate fellatio. But I looked at the full video more carefully, and agreed that he did indeed simulate fellatio. I even appended a previous comment, on Sunday morning, November 3rd, stating that I'd changed my mind.
You claim to have "changed" your mind, once you realized that acknowledging that a candidate for President of the United States publicly simulated fellatio, is acknowledging that he did an incredibly crude and bizarre act.
I'm not talking about an incredibly crude and bizarre act done in private. I'm talking about an incredibly crude and bizarre act done at a campaign rally. I trust you agree that nothing done at a campaign rally has come close to miming fellatio on a microphone holder?
I trust you agree that we've both already agreed that Trump did not simulate fellatio at the rally.
Don't you remember agreeing to that? If you don't remember, re-read your own posts. Not remembering could be a sign of dementia. You might want to get Dr. Marcus to check you out.
And I agree with Hillary that Bill never should have penetrated that intern with a cigar.
But if you insist on public bizarre acts there's away Joe "the child sniffer" Biden.
"I trust you agree that we've both already agreed that Trump did not simulate fellatio at the rally."
No, in fact, we first agreed that he did simulate fellatio at the rally. Then you pretended to change your mind. If you don't remember that, re-read your own comments and check the time stamps.
But you do remember that, don't you? Your problem isn't lack of memory...it's dishonesty, isn't it?
"You changed yours (twice) about this so you should know."
I've already explained to you that I only changed my mind once, and even pointed out that I'd gone back and appended original comments, to note that I'd changed my mind, and that I now agree with Gary Marcus and others.
"You're pretending only you get to change your mind (twice)..."
You're a liar, Roger. A absolutely shameless liar.
Sounds like you're not going to update you other comments.
I think you, and I, and most importantly Hillary Clinton, can strongly agree that Bill gets the "incredibly crude and bizarre act award." Bill gets extra points for being in the White House at the time and for the cigar story lasting in the media for so long.
But I commend you for trying to make this nothingburger last so long here in the comments. Even the leftist press has moved on.
"I've changed my mind. Trump did not simulate fellatio. It was a non-fellatio joke about a mic stand that was too low. I know you agree with me."
"I already told I thought Trumps pantomiming fellation was a joke following a rant about being provided a mic stand that was too low."
Try to agree with yourself, first.
"I've seen other presidents make jokes, so it's not a first."
You've never seen a presidential candidate simulate fellatio at a rally. No presidential candidate has ever been *remotely* that crude. (Feel free to disagree, but if you disagree, provide evidence. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.")
When one changes one's mind, one no longer agrees with the first position. That's how changing one's mind works. I know you agree with this. Or at least you will if you think about it.
We both know Trump did not crudely simulate fellatio and have both said so because we both watched the video. We both know that the video is the evidence that we both made our decision on.
You might want to try to agree with yourself. Part of you is really onto something.
I changed my mind--that Trump did actually simulate fellatio--after looking at the video more carefully. When I first watched the full video, I simply watched the entire approximately four minutes, without focusing on what he did at 3:00 into the video.
You "changed" your mind, because your acknowledgement that he did simulate fellatio became inconvenient for you.
I changed my mind once and I'm sticking to it.
You've changed your mind twice. Now that you have you changed it again you should go to you other comments where you were last in the "no Trump fellatio" camp and let them know. Be consistent.
"You've changed your mind twice."
I haven't changed my mind twice. I initially wrote, after looking at the full video, that it was clear Trump didn't simulate fellatio. But I looked at the full video more carefully, and agreed that he did indeed simulate fellatio. I even appended a previous comment, on Sunday morning, November 3rd, stating that I'd changed my mind.
You claim to have "changed" your mind, once you realized that acknowledging that a candidate for President of the United States publicly simulated fellatio, is acknowledging that he did an incredibly crude and bizarre act.
And the winner of the "incredibly crude and bizarr act" award is:
Slick Willie, in the East Wing, with the cigar.
I'm not talking about an incredibly crude and bizarre act done in private. I'm talking about an incredibly crude and bizarre act done at a campaign rally. I trust you agree that nothing done at a campaign rally has come close to miming fellatio on a microphone holder?
I trust you agree that we've both already agreed that Trump did not simulate fellatio at the rally.
Don't you remember agreeing to that? If you don't remember, re-read your own posts. Not remembering could be a sign of dementia. You might want to get Dr. Marcus to check you out.
And I agree with Hillary that Bill never should have penetrated that intern with a cigar.
But if you insist on public bizarre acts there's away Joe "the child sniffer" Biden.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H5NJZMDumY
"I trust you agree that we've both already agreed that Trump did not simulate fellatio at the rally."
No, in fact, we first agreed that he did simulate fellatio at the rally. Then you pretended to change your mind. If you don't remember that, re-read your own comments and check the time stamps.
But you do remember that, don't you? Your problem isn't lack of memory...it's dishonesty, isn't it?
I already explained to you how changing one's mind works. You changed yours (twice) about this so you should know.
You're pretending only you get to change your mind (twice) and anyone else who changing their mind is dishonest.
So lack of memory and an authoritarian streak? Paging Dr. Marcus.
"You changed yours (twice) about this so you should know."
I've already explained to you that I only changed my mind once, and even pointed out that I'd gone back and appended original comments, to note that I'd changed my mind, and that I now agree with Gary Marcus and others.
"You're pretending only you get to change your mind (twice)..."
You're a liar, Roger. A absolutely shameless liar.
Sounds like you're not going to update you other comments.
I think you, and I, and most importantly Hillary Clinton, can strongly agree that Bill gets the "incredibly crude and bizarre act award." Bill gets extra points for being in the White House at the time and for the cigar story lasting in the media for so long.
But I commend you for trying to make this nothingburger last so long here in the comments. Even the leftist press has moved on.
Yes, what Bill Clinton did with Monica Lewinsky was crude and bizarre. But it wasn't being filmed for broadcast to a TV audience.
"But I commend you for trying to make this nothingburger last so long here in the comments. Even the leftist press has moved on."
It's not a "nothingburger." It's by far the most crude and bizarre thing any U.S. presidential candidate has ever done speaking at a campaign rally.
If it's not a nothingburger then you might want to get the media on it instead of prattling on here in the comments. Convince them.
Once you've convinced them, I consider reconsidering.
"Once you've convinced them, I consider reconsidering."
Heh, heh, heh! Good one! Finish with a joke.