For example, what's your opinion on whether principled AI is possible?
To you, this looks like a banality, yet the issue has been fiercely debated by leading people in the field. The business world is now betting close to half a trillion on believing their answer is the right one.
The range of opinions on AI is wide. There's the hype people, who claim AI will become sentient in a year and will kill us all. There's pragmatic people as myself, with "banal" comments as above. There's skeptics who think this is all a scam.
Where do you stand, and what exactly do you disagree about? As it is, you act like a troll, bringing nothing to the conversation.
Do you try to write comments that are as banal as possible?
Because you really do get close to the abosolute Heisenberg limit of banality every single time. It's quite impressive.
For example, what's your opinion on whether principled AI is possible?
To you, this looks like a banality, yet the issue has been fiercely debated by leading people in the field. The business world is now betting close to half a trillion on believing their answer is the right one.
The range of opinions on AI is wide. There's the hype people, who claim AI will become sentient in a year and will kill us all. There's pragmatic people as myself, with "banal" comments as above. There's skeptics who think this is all a scam.
Where do you stand, and what exactly do you disagree about? As it is, you act like a troll, bringing nothing to the conversation.