Big news today, via Stephanie Palazzolo at The Information: the group Public Citizen yesterday petitioned the state California to reevaluate OpenAI’s nonprofit status.
As Robert Weissman, the President of Public Citizen put it to me on a phone call, the OpenAI drama seemed in part to be a showdown between for profit and nonprofit aspects of the organization; it is not clear that organization as whole has remained true to its nonprofit mission. “I don’t think it’s a radical argument we are making. There was a competition here and the faction that won wanted to pursue profit.”
If the State of California chooses to investigate, one possible outcome could be that the State of California could force OpenAI to dissolve the nonprofit parent, making a distribution, conceivably measured in the billions of dollars, to an external charity (focused in whole or in part on AI). As Public Citizen’s Weissman also said to me, “with billions of dollars you could really fund some important work, independent of what the remaining for-profit might choose to do.”
Stay tuned. You can read the complaint here: https://www.citizen.org/article/letter-to-california-attorney-general-on-openais-nonprofit-status/
Gary Marcus has wondered for a long time about the dynamics between the for profit and non profit elements of OpenAI. Perhaps the State of California will finally find out.
Harder to claim that you must be given access to everyone else’s copyrighted materials gratis when you can no longer claim to be a nonprofit defending humanity from your creation.
Would be nice if the AG forces some transparency.