Does anyone else find the limitations of the LLMs, and therefore (hopefully) deep learning generally, quite relieving? We are not ready for AGI, indeed my hope is it is at least a century away, so this potentially being a false dawn in the quest for AI makes me a lot more optimistic for humanity's future.
Does anyone else find the limitations of the LLMs, and therefore (hopefully) deep learning generally, quite relieving? We are not ready for AGI, indeed my hope is it is at least a century away, so this potentially being a false dawn in the quest for AI makes me a lot more optimistic for humanity's future.
Interesting. It seems to me that the widespread realization that deep learning is totally irrelevant to solving AGI would in fact accelerate its arrival. I mean, it would cause many to abandon DL and work on other promising approaches.
Should not AGI pessimists instead praise DL and LLMs as much as they can? :-D
OpenAI says plainly that ChatGPT is an augmentation of its users. When people speak to others to clarify their own thinking, by using them as a sounding board, they don't expect flawless thinking from the others. In fact errors in others can enhance that clarifying process ( Psalms 8:2, "Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength" ). However, hostile intent on the part of ChatGPT users yields little but amplified hostility. Back in the day, occasionally software developers would say: I can make it fool proof, but I can't make it damn fool proof.
As Cassius said to Brutus (in Julius Caesar) Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings.
Me >> Can ChatGPT be likened to babes and sucklings?
ChatGPT >> In the context of Psalm 8:2, "babes and sucklings" refers to young and inexperienced children who are not yet able to fully articulate their thoughts and ideas. As an artificial intelligence language model, ChatGPT is not a human child and does not have the same limitations or developmental stages.
However, in a broader sense, ChatGPT can be compared to a child in the sense that it is still a relatively new technology that is constantly learning and growing. It is still in the early stages of development and has not yet reached its full potential. In this sense, it is like a child that is still growing and developing.
Moreover, ChatGPT's ability to process and generate language is a powerful tool that can be used to convey thoughts and ideas in a way that may be considered "strong" or impactful, similar to how the verse suggests that God can use the words of babes and sucklings to establish strength against His enemies.
Does anyone else find the limitations of the LLMs, and therefore (hopefully) deep learning generally, quite relieving? We are not ready for AGI, indeed my hope is it is at least a century away, so this potentially being a false dawn in the quest for AI makes me a lot more optimistic for humanity's future.
Interesting. It seems to me that the widespread realization that deep learning is totally irrelevant to solving AGI would in fact accelerate its arrival. I mean, it would cause many to abandon DL and work on other promising approaches.
Should not AGI pessimists instead praise DL and LLMs as much as they can? :-D
Haha quite possibly - brb am going to cheer DL on twitter!
OpenAI says plainly that ChatGPT is an augmentation of its users. When people speak to others to clarify their own thinking, by using them as a sounding board, they don't expect flawless thinking from the others. In fact errors in others can enhance that clarifying process ( Psalms 8:2, "Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength" ). However, hostile intent on the part of ChatGPT users yields little but amplified hostility. Back in the day, occasionally software developers would say: I can make it fool proof, but I can't make it damn fool proof.
As Cassius said to Brutus (in Julius Caesar) Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings.
Me >> Can ChatGPT be likened to babes and sucklings?
ChatGPT >> In the context of Psalm 8:2, "babes and sucklings" refers to young and inexperienced children who are not yet able to fully articulate their thoughts and ideas. As an artificial intelligence language model, ChatGPT is not a human child and does not have the same limitations or developmental stages.
However, in a broader sense, ChatGPT can be compared to a child in the sense that it is still a relatively new technology that is constantly learning and growing. It is still in the early stages of development and has not yet reached its full potential. In this sense, it is like a child that is still growing and developing.
Moreover, ChatGPT's ability to process and generate language is a powerful tool that can be used to convey thoughts and ideas in a way that may be considered "strong" or impactful, similar to how the verse suggests that God can use the words of babes and sucklings to establish strength against His enemies.