Marcus on AI

Home
Archive
About

Most people don’t think GenAI has improved their productivity

Damning new study from Upwork

Gary Marcus's avatar
Gary Marcus
Jul 29, 2024
Cross-posted by Marcus on AI
"The is the second of two recent posts from Gary Marcus I thought worth sharing. This one is less technical, more practical, and probably resonates more with anyone who has been compelled to actually use "generative AI" of the sort produced by Meta and OpenAI. Workers are not really loving it-and that's the tip of the iceberg. "
- Art Keller

Wow! Incredibly damning new study on GenAI from the Upwork Research Institute, via Baldur Bjarnason (whose wonderful essay on LLMs and how they fool the gullible I discussed in April).

Bjarnason‘s new essay, The other shoe dropping on ‘AI’ and office work, reports that Upwork found that

“Nearly half (47%) of workers using AI say they have no idea how to achieve the productivity gains their employers expect. Over three in four (77%) say AI tools have decreased their productivity and added to their workload in at least one way.”

Says Bjarnason, “It’s quite unusual for a study like this on a new office tool, roughly two years after that tool—ChatGPT—exploded into people’s workplaces, to return such a resoundingly negative sentiment.”

§

Many coders and tech aficionados may love ChatGPT for work, but much of the outside world feels quite differently.

As Bjarnason points out, “it fits with the studies on the actual functionality of said tool: the incredibly common and hard to fix errors, the biases, the general low quality of the output, and the often stated expectation from management that it’s a magic fix for the organisational catastrophe that is the mass layoff fad.”

Read Bjarnason’s new essay here.

Share

PS Microsoft Bing completely flubbed, 4/4, “people going yuck towards Generative AI”. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

No posts

© 2026 Gary Marcus · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture