As long as NN is there it's going to be a kludge. NNs don't belong in a system involving any kind of legitimate epistemology; Their presence de-legitimizes knowledge claims.
NNs as a technology is a distraction that's holding back AI development as a whole
Those are ultimately kludges and bandaids. It will be a perpetual band-aiding exercise. See this famous "Panda" example of how NNs don't actually identify objects mentioned in this article https://towardsdatascience.com/fooling-neural-networks-with-adversarial-examples-8afd36258a03
As long as NN is there it's going to be a kludge. NNs don't belong in a system involving any kind of legitimate epistemology; Their presence de-legitimizes knowledge claims.
NNs as a technology is a distraction that's holding back AI development as a whole
Sunken cost fallacy. No, I'm not the one standing on the wrong side of "ideology" here. https://aeon.co/essays/your-brain-does-not-process-information-and-it-is-not-a-computer https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/feb/27/why-your-brain-is-not-a-computer-neuroscience-neural-networks-consciousness