75 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Are you using a chatbot to respond? You're just giving vague, hand-waving statements. No- The project is in one big hot mess. https://spectrum.ieee.org/self-driving-cars-2662494269

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 1
Comment removed
Expand full comment

It IS hand-waving. "Very good" IS hand-waving. You're not being specific on anything. Gary WAS being specific in his last article: "Waymo runs in a few extremely well-mapped cities with mostly very good weather, but to my knowledge it’s never been tested in places with bad weather, poorly mapped roads, alternative driving patterns, etc. The generality of Waymo’s approach is very much still in question"

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 1Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

You didn't mention any situation involved with Cruise, because those are real world situations that Waymo couldn't come close to handling either. They know it'd just do just as bad as Cruise did. I don't see even remotely similar situations in the simulation examples either. Those situations are gross simplifications, as the Cruise pedestrian-dragging scenario showed.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 2
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Uh, 10+ years of development isn’t “rushing” but “a gross underestimation of the issue”. The Apollo program was done developing in that same time. Here’s what will happen: all the rest of them will either fold as so many AD companies already did or forced to abandon full AD as Tesla has practically had to do. It’s high time to face reality.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 2
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Exactly which fundamentals, in exactly which way?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 2
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Alphabet folded a whole load of things. They're famous for their Google Graveyard.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 2Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment